Praise Puns- Anna and the French Kiss

Welcome to this week's edition of Praise Puns.

Mandatory introduction:

You ever notice that when real reviewers are reviewing books, they always make puns?

Well, we here at Wake Up at Seven have a sense of humor, and will take the liberty to make fun of those who are too clever for their own good. We're going to point out any puns that are pasted on the back of YA books, whether they're from another author or from Kirkus reviews.

-----

Today we're looking at:

Anna and the French Kiss

"Smart and sensual, Anna and the French Kiss is everything your heart is longing for. You'll want to live inside this story forever." -Lisa McMann

"Very romantic. You should date this book." -Maureen Johnson

"Anna and the French Kiss charms [readers] with its Parisian setting and a trés bien boy." -MTV.com

 Not a whole lot of great ones, although the paperback has a total of eleven blurbs. Yes. Eleven. They really want you to buy this book.

However, I actually like that there isn't a lot of punniness, because most of the praise is true. Although there's a lot of "magicals" and "charmings" and related synonyms, I'm happy to say these outlets meet my approval.

So that was the short segment for today. 

Leave a comment if you found any praise puns in other books, and tweet this post if you're a trés bien boy.

Don't forget to check out last week's month's edition- Anna Dressed in Blood.

Comparisons- Are People Overdoing it?

Several years ago, when Twilight was first published, everything was compared to it. If I had walked into a bookstore in 2008 all I would have seen would be "perfect for fans of Twilight" or "If you liked Twilight..." on the backs of book covers. Not to mention the endless blurbs from Stephanie Meyer.

Even before that, people were looking for "The Next Harry Potter". So was the onslaught of Harry Potter getting endless mentions in praise and reviews of drastically different genres. I would pick up a memoir, and it would be compared to HP. (Like your life story is about getting stalked by an evil wizard.)

The trinity. (from ashworthcollege.com)

The next (actually good) big thing was The Hunger Games. In response came the floods of Dystopias, lapping up at reader's feet, drowning them in a flurry of "If you liked the Hunger Games, don't miss this."

The difference was, however, The Hunger Games was actually a good novel, so to be compared to it is a win/lose situation.

But it's also meaningless.

You don't want to be compared to something successful. That's like Google Chrome saying it's the next Facebook. You don't want to replace something that WORKS. You want to BE the mold breaker. There's a reason that The Hunger Games booted Twilight from its throne. Because it was wholly different. No one compared The Hunger Games to Twilight.

I was reading the blurbs on Throne of Glass by Sarah J. Maas, and a lot of them compared it to THG. One blurb said,

"...watch out Katniss, I think Celaena [MC] could give you a run for your money!" [Taken from physical ARC]

Although this was said in the best intentions, I have to say that if someone said that about my book, I'd be pissed. That's pretty much saying, "Oh, your book is good, I guess maybe it could be as good as The Hunger Games..."

On the other hand, Fifty Shades of Grey is now mainstream, despite being of a very niche genre. It, too is getting compared to everything. (I should add that romance novels getting compared to 50 Shades is completely wrong... erotica is NOT romance. At all.)

Prompting this tweet from Elsie Chapman, author of the 2013 Dystopian debut, Dualed:

 True story.

All authors shouldn't have to go through the pain of getting compared to something else, even if it's good. But if it's bad- that's another story.

Plus, as the saying goes, you can't compare apples and oranges.

So, what do you think? Apples or oranges?