Comparisons- Are People Overdoing it?

Several years ago, when Twilight was first published, everything was compared to it. If I had walked into a bookstore in 2008 all I would have seen would be "perfect for fans of Twilight" or "If you liked Twilight..." on the backs of book covers. Not to mention the endless blurbs from Stephanie Meyer.

Even before that, people were looking for "The Next Harry Potter". So was the onslaught of Harry Potter getting endless mentions in praise and reviews of drastically different genres. I would pick up a memoir, and it would be compared to HP. (Like your life story is about getting stalked by an evil wizard.)

The trinity. (from ashworthcollege.com)

The next (actually good) big thing was The Hunger Games. In response came the floods of Dystopias, lapping up at reader's feet, drowning them in a flurry of "If you liked the Hunger Games, don't miss this."

The difference was, however, The Hunger Games was actually a good novel, so to be compared to it is a win/lose situation.

But it's also meaningless.

You don't want to be compared to something successful. That's like Google Chrome saying it's the next Facebook. You don't want to replace something that WORKS. You want to BE the mold breaker. There's a reason that The Hunger Games booted Twilight from its throne. Because it was wholly different. No one compared The Hunger Games to Twilight.

I was reading the blurbs on Throne of Glass by Sarah J. Maas, and a lot of them compared it to THG. One blurb said,

"...watch out Katniss, I think Celaena [MC] could give you a run for your money!" [Taken from physical ARC]

Although this was said in the best intentions, I have to say that if someone said that about my book, I'd be pissed. That's pretty much saying, "Oh, your book is good, I guess maybe it could be as good as The Hunger Games..."

On the other hand, Fifty Shades of Grey is now mainstream, despite being of a very niche genre. It, too is getting compared to everything. (I should add that romance novels getting compared to 50 Shades is completely wrong... erotica is NOT romance. At all.)

Prompting this tweet from Elsie Chapman, author of the 2013 Dystopian debut, Dualed:

 True story.

All authors shouldn't have to go through the pain of getting compared to something else, even if it's good. But if it's bad- that's another story.

Plus, as the saying goes, you can't compare apples and oranges.

So, what do you think? Apples or oranges?

Mockingjay Split into Two Movies??

Here's something other than the news about the Mortal Instruments casting of Simon, because you guys have probably heard that about ten billion times today.

Instead, let me talk about how Mockingjay is going to be split into two movies.

Yes, you heard correctly. Mockingjay, the third book in The Hunger Games trilogy, is going to be split into two parts, following in the wake of Breaking Dawn and Deathly Hallows.

Remember when WB announced Deathly Hallows  was going to be split and we were all outraged? We all thought it was a milk for money. However, when part two came out, we were all pretty happy. I mean, so much crap happens in that 700+ page book, it was understandable even if it was a greedy grab at extending the successful franchise.

Now, when that was announced to happen to Breaking Dawn, I was really mad. How could they do that to me? You know, I am apathetic about Twilight as much as the next person, but I enjoy participating in complaining how nothing happened in Breaking Dawn. If anything, Eclipse should have been turned into two parts. That was arguably the best book in the series.

That matter aside, I just wanted the movie franchise to end. So you see my problem with Mockingjay being in two parts.

Nothing happens in that book that you could possibly split that into two parts. I agree, the book is a bit bigger than the others, but it's still a fast read. This is obviously just trying to draw on the fact that The Hunger Games broke records. Understandable. It was awesome.

But it gets old. But also noted is that fans grow up. The longer you try to extend this, the more people lose interest. A lot of people would disagree, but you can't argue when I say that there were a lot of teenage girls at the midnight premiere. (I looked like a frickin pedophile there.)

And the last movie won't be released until November 2015!

So. Your thoughts? Are you happy to get two movies because you luuuuuurve the series, or are you like me and you want just one movie? And who wants to bet that they'll do this with the last book of the Divergent Trilogy as well?